|
Even
today there are many misconceptions about the Loyalists; that
they were British-born upper-class snobs who spoke with a
hoity-toity accent, and they wanted to force British ways upon
down-trodden Americans.
Bruce Wilson states that most Loyalists,
54 per cent of those claiming loses in the Revolutionary War,
were not born in Britain. Nor were they of the upper class. Only 42 per
cent of claimants had more than 10 acres of land cleared. Most
were, in fact from the lower and middle classes.
John Burch is an
example; when he arrived in New York City, he was a tinsmith,
selling tin cups, saucers, and plates that he made himself. Some
were from families that had prospered in America.
John Butler's father
was a lieutenant in the Army and on half pay but managed to
create a large estate in the Mohawk Valley. Many Loyalists such
as the Young and Nelles families were descended from people who
had fled to America to avoid religious persecution. The
immigrant Young (Jung) and Nelles families were Palatinate
Germans who were grateful to the British for accepting them into
New York Province. They were afraid that the Dutch, who had
always hated the British, would steal their land if they won the
war.
The
reasons why people chose the British side in the war are not
simple. This was, after all, America's first civil war. Some
people had prospered and liked things the way they were. Others
made their choices based on personalities, just as today people
vote for candidates based not on policies but simply on whether
they like the candidate. Others had suffered at the hands of
zealots and people who were just after their money or land. Some
tenants followed their landlords, others went in the opposite
direction to their landlords.
Most
Loyalists had democratic views; some
Loyalists even had political views not too different from the Whig or
Patriot view. Many Loyalists raised in America were opposed to
the concept that superiority and quality were inherited by birth
rather than earned by deeds. The British hated democracy,
believing it to be disloyal, even traitorous. So people like Catherine Parr Traill and Susanna Moodie wrote about some Loyalists as
"insolent Yankees" who would not knuckle their heads to their
"superiors". Aristocrats like Thomas Talbot could never really
accept Loyalists as being his equal; even his closest ally,
Mahlon Burwell.
The
main entry point for Loyalists into Southwest Ontario was
Fort Niagara. Although some families, notably those of former
Butler's Rangers, had settled on the west side of the Niagara
River, it was not until 1781 that land was bought from the
Mississaugas for settlement. The early Loyalist settlers were
non-paying tenants and received one year's provisions and all
tools from the government. In return, settlers were to sell all
surplus produce to the garrison of Fort Niagara. This guaranteed
an income for the settlers and a local, cheap supply of food for
the garrison. In 1782, the government hired Butler's Ranger
Lieutenant David Brass to build a gristmill and a sawmill on Four
Mile Creek, near the junction of Four Mile Creek Road and Lake
Shore Road to the west of Niagara-on-the-Lake. The remains of the gristmill still survive in the basement of a house in St David's.
Old Secord Mill in St David's
Most of the early
settlers were former Butler's Rangers, especially after 1784,
when the Rangers were disbanded. Other Loyalist settlers were
from other military units and the Indian Department. Eventually,
after the area was surveyed, settlers were granted the lots on
which they had settled.
So
what exactly is a Loyalist? When, in 1783, the British
government decided to compensate Loyalists for their losses, it
defined a Loyalist as a person: American by birth or living in
the colony in 1775, who had rendered substantial service to the
Crown during the war, and who had left the colony during or
shortly after the war. This definition was different from that
used to grant land claims. For this, the definition of a
Loyalist was stretched to almost anyone who would swear an oath
of allegiance. Since this would rule out all Quakers, Tunkers,
and Mennonites, who did not believe in swearing oaths, even this
definition was stretched by 1794 to allow them to qualify. A
third definition was used by Lord Dorchester to define those who
were entitled to affix U.E. to their names to recognize their
contribution to the Unity of the Empire. This defined a Loyalist
as a person who had adhered to the Unity of the Empire and
joined the Royal Standard before the Treaty of Peace in 1793,
and all their descendants of either sex. It assumed residence in
Canada but gave no cutoff date. A cutoff date was eventually
added; all Loyalists must have been residing in Canada before
July 28, 1798.
|